Philosophical formalists have suggested that the wrong is a more specific one: It is the wrong of using another person’s means, what belongs to them, without their consent.298 But neither ordinary moral thought nor the rest of tort law appears to suppose that unforeseeably using another person’s means exposes a defendant to compensatory liability. Suppose a defendant is camping in a forest, and he burns some large logs, lying on the ground, for a campfire. Unforeseeably, the logs are persons whose bodies have been masterfully disguised by a villain. Neither battery, nor negligence, nor any other tort would provide a cause of action against the defendant; the battery claim would fail because the defendant has not intended to contact the person of another.299 The absence of any such action comports with the common moral intuition that such utterly unforeseeable harm lies beyond the scope of “how far the responsibility of [a] defendant ought fairly to extend.”300
Девушка элегантно отомстила соседке за съеденный без спроса торт02:31
23:50, 27 февраля 2026Бывший СССР，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
Monday's dissolution of the government could mark a significant shift in the country's political landscape with the military leader seeking to establish a new administration.
，更多细节参见新收录的资料
В Великобритании мужчина попал в тюрьму за то, что использовал бизнес-аккаунт в мессенджере для домогательств к клиенткам. Об этом сообщает BBC News.，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
Fan came out of stands at Münster v Hertha Berlin