I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Perplexity 推出 Perplexity ComputerAI 搜索平台 Perplexity 于 2 月 26 日正式发布 Perplexity Computer——一款基于浏览器的新型聊天界面，可整合多个具备自主执行能力的 AI 模型，自动完成端到端工作流。
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
17. Crazy Old Lady
Москвичи пожаловались на зловонную квартиру-свалку с телами животных и тараканами18:04