This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
英國超市將巧克力鎖進防盜盒阻止「訂單式」偷竊
，详情可参考夫子
在英國，除非你選擇退出器官捐贈制度，否則一般會被視為同意在身故後成為器官捐贈者。
Жители Санкт-Петербурга устроили «крысогон»17:52